Home Sweet Home Ignorance is just Ignorant The Kings Beacon
The Kings Beacon
The Beacon
1. U.S. Supreme Court told me
2. Background
3. The dred scott story
4. The fall of the kings
5. The story of Hans
6. The dubious origins of 14
6 (a) Another Confession. The threat of the 14th amendment.
7. The short story
8. My vehicle my rules
9. Where's the king
10. Through the courts
11. Prohibition
12. Men and Women
13. Religion
The State Owns Your Car
 A traffic ticket is an action by the owner of the vehicle against you for misusing their property ( a tort). It is a privilege to use the owner's vehicle and it is a privilege that made them the owner.
TWO Supreme Courts
 The Supreme Court of the United States is the hightest inferior court that congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
SOVEREIGNTY
The TRUE AMERICAN TREASURE.
Shanghaied in America
The lure is Freedom.
What can I do?
Quietly - I have enough trouble.
Freemasons
Noble order or deluded dupes?
How to Stop Spam
A new approach.
 
Contact Us
 
[print friendly page?]



The inferior congressional court known as

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


MALINDA NICOLE DIROSA

AND

MICHAEL E. DIROSA

APPELLANTS IN PROPER PERSON.

V.

FORD E. STINSON, JR. DISTRICT JUDGE

26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ACCUSED


EMERGENCY APPEAL FOR JUDICIAL PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE OF DUTY.

MALINDA NICOLE DIROSA, APPELLANT IN PROPER PERSON

C/O 318 LAKESHORE PKWY.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

XXX - XXX - XXXX

MICHAEL E. DIROSA, APPELLANT IN PROPER PERSON

C/O 318 LAKESHORE PKWY.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

XXX - XXX - XXXX

FORD E. STINSON, JR., ACCUSED

DISTRICT JUDGE

26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

P.O. BOX 396

BENTON, LA 71006


Into this inferior congressional court known as the Supreme Court of the United States comes Malinda Nicole DiRosa and Michael E. DiRosa, hereinafter known jointly as Sovereigns, to demand Judicial Process from this inferior congressional court.

These Sovereigns do reject the notion that a “leave to file” is appropriate in this instance. These Sovereigns do not need permission to file as it is their Right and their Duty to demand that this inferior congressional court exercise its supervisory jurisdiction over its inferior congressional courts to restrain them from repeated commission of the worst act a court can commit, proceeding absent jurisdiction.

These Sovereigns do notice this inferior congressional court that it has no jurisdiction over these Sovereigns, nor, does this inferior congressional court have jurisdiction over the issues at the core of these disputes.

There can be no doubt that we are Sovereigns. It is self-evident. As Human Being we are endowed by our creator with unalienable rights. We have declared it in the Unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, the foundation upon which our more perfect union was created. These self-evident, unalienable rights were declared before the government of our more perfect union was created and are beyond the reach of any government. It is self-evident that these Divine Rights are Unalienable by humans and can only be revoked by the Creator. There is a clear chain of title to our Rights.

These Sovereigns have also claimed that they are Citizens of the State of Louisiana, by birth location. We are Sovereigns, by Divine Right. We are also owners in common of the common property of the Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana by birth location. It is our inheritance from the owners in common before us. We are those trust inheritors and guardians of the common property of the Sovereigns into perpetuity.

If this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana which has brought these vile and malicious charges against us does believe that we are not Sovereigns, Citizens of the State of Louisiana, let them prove their claim. We are not citizens of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana nor aliens in the State of Louisiana. Yet, your subordinate judges ignore their lack of jurisdiction despite continuous demands and positive, irrefutable and uncontested proof.

Who or what is this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana? Is it the government of the Sovereigns of Louisiana or is it an occupational government of the conquered Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana? The document pretending to be the Constitution of the State of Louisiana confesses that this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana is an occupational government, Citizens of the State of Louisiana are expressly prohibited from holding public office.

Furthermore, as Citizens of the State of Louisiana, our legitimate government would not be able to bring forth any charges in its own name. Valid charges would be in the name of the People of the State of Louisiana, Sovereigns over their government.

These Sovereigns have proved by positive, irrefutable and uncontested proof that Article VII Section 5 of the Louisiana State Constitution is invalid. Yet, your subordinate judges have, repeatedly, with a total absence of jurisdiction or even the pretense of jurisdiction, ruled this article of the Louisiana Constitution valid. And do still enforce an invalid Louisiana Constitutional Article which they, absent right, have declared valid. By what right do they rule on the validity of the Louisiana State Constitution?

If Article VII Section 5 of the Louisiana State constitution is not an illegal bill of credit and does not steal, without compensation or due process of law every motorized vehicle, bicycle and ridden animals as it plainly states, then refute the proof?

These Sovereigns have sought a resolution of the validity of the Louisiana State Constitution in the Louisiana Supreme Court who refused to rule on the validity of the State Constitution. It was discovered that they could not rule on the validity of the State Constitution, the “justices” of the Louisiana Supreme Court are foreign nationals. Again, Citizens of the State of Louisiana are positively prohibited from holding a State wide elective office. Now, we Sovereigns will be the first to admit that this inferior congressional court has no jurisdiction over the Louisiana Supreme Court, however, you do have jurisdiction over your Negroes. Control your Negroes or corral them.

Is the Constitution of the State of Louisiana invalid? Citizens of the State of Louisiana are unrepresented and our interests are uncared for. Our State government is infested with foreign nationals. The Louisiana Supreme Court can not answer these questions, it is improperly set with foreign nationals. Your inferior courts can not answer these questions. This court, which is apparently the highest inferior court that congress has established, can not answer these questions. There is only one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the united States shall be vested created by our Constitution. It is the only Court in this Country that can answer these questions.

These Sovereigns have proved by positive, irrefutable and uncontested proof that the invasion of the State of Louisiana and nine other States was an illegal act perpetrated by treasonous conspirators who overthrew the legitimate Congress of the united States. The Louisiana Bar Association admits to this fact.

When the representatives of ten States were illegally evicted from Congress, congress ceased to be the valid Congress of the United States. When this invalid “rump” congress passed the reconstruction act, invaded and conquered ten States, they reaffirmed the illegitimacy of this band of Traitors calling themselves congress. When this band of Traitors installed puppet governments and forced the passage of the 14th Amendment “at the point of a bayonet” they betrayed us for the third time and must be branded Traitors of each of the Citizens of each of the ten invaded States and Traitors to all of the Citizens of all the States ever since. The Louisiana Bar Association admits to this fact.

The occupational government of the Treasonous invaders still exists in the State of Louisiana. It is confessed by their manifesto claiming to be the valid Constitution of the Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana.

The theft of our unalienable rights is still pretended to be valid. The invasion and conquest of ten States and the installation of an occupational government controlling an occupational army is still pretended to be valid.

The change in our National Constitution, “at the point of a bayonet” is pretended to be valid. The abuse of Sovereigns, now “reconstructed” into Negroes, is pretended to be the will of the people.

These Sovereigns have stripped the color of law off of our enslavement and have exposed nothing but petty tyrants, traitors to us all. If our proof were in error, how simply could we have been shown the error of our augments? The horror in my proof is that there is no flaw.

There can only be two reasons why the entity calling itself the State of Louisiana does not refute my proof that they have no cause of action, right of action nor standing. They either do not know by what right they claim to be empowered to abuse us, or, they are ashamed of what they have been pretending to be that right. Their Treasonous betrayal is only defensible by silence. There is no defense for what they have done under color of law. They have confused the power to act with the right to act.

The inferior courts to the congressional Supreme Court of the United States have been willing participants in disregarding every law of God or man. Control your subordinates. It is a duty you have accepted and been paid for.

These Sovereigns have repeatedly attempted to reach the one supreme Court created by our Constitution. Each attempt has been thwarted by the clerk of this inferior congressional court. He has hijacked their mail and issued summary judgments on the letterhead of this inferior court.

If we Sovereigns adopt the pretense that the justices of the inferior congressional court known as the Supreme Court of the United States are unaware of our repeated attempts to find the only Court left to Sovereigns, then we Sovereigns must adopt the fact that this inferior congressional court has so failed in its supervisory duties that even clerks are allowed to rule on issues concerning our founding documents. If this is the case, then this document is a demand from the Sovereigns upon this inferior congressional court to control its Negroes or corral them. The Constitution demands it.

We Sovereigns can not find a rule pertaining to Sovereigns demanding specific performance of Duties paid for. We seek no writ, though some may issue, from this inferior supervisory court.

We Sovereigns are DEMANDING that this inferior congressional court perform its duties and inquire into the total disregard for any law of God or man by its subordinates. Even the rules of the occupational government are being disregarded with impunity. It is your Duty.

Further, we Sovereigns are DEMANDING that this inferior congressional court submit the attached Demand for Judicial Process to your superior court, The one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested, created by our constitution and advise these Sovereigns as to the correct address of the one supreme Court so that we may reach them directly. It is your Duty.

These Sovereigns are victim of illegal imprisonment, extortion and theft by your unsupervised subordinates. As they have proved many times, arrest, imprisonment, extortion, confiscation and endless forced appearances are the penalty if we are caught traveling, even locally.

These cases have been dragging on for years. Sovereign Michael E. DiRosa has had vile, fraudulent, infamous charges pending since January of 2004 and a second set of vile, fraudulent, infamous charges pending since December of 2006. Nor, has there been any activity in these actions since October 30th 2008. (F1523230, F1525159, F1678532 and F1681551 on the Docket of the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana and cases numbered 2007-KH-131 and 2007-KH-866 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.) Yet, in all of this time there has been no proof offered that this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana has a valid cause of action, right of action or standing, nor has there been any proof offered that the courts into which they have dragged me is a court of competent jurisdiction.

Sovereign Malinda Nicole DiRosa is in the most serious peril. Absent even the pretense of jurisdiction the 26th judicial district court aided by their cohorts the district attorney and the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana, your supervised subordinates, are intentionally and maliciously attempting to bludgeon her into slavery, under color of law. These Cases Numbered 172,621; 172,622; 172,623 on the docket of the 26th judicial district court and KH 09-45179 on the docket of the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana are just their most recent attempt. The same disregard for every law of God or man can also be seen in Cases Numbered KH 07-43205 on the docket of the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana and 157,313 and 157,314 on the docket of the 26th judicial district court.

This can again be seen in the change of the title of the appeal. These Sovereigns appealed to the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana (Docket number KH 09-45179 ) entitled Malinda Nicole DiRosa and Michael E. DiRosa v. Ford E. Stinson, Jr. District judge and were demanding that the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana exercise its supervisory jurisdiction in that No law of God or man was being followed in the 26th judicial district court. These Sovereigns have challenged the cause of action, right of action and standing of this entity fraudulently calling itself the State of Louisiana. This entity calling itself the State of Louisiana is, in fact, a vile “reconstruction” of the State of Louisiana created by the Traitors who conquered the Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana and has no lawful standing. Yet, by changing the title, the court of appeal, 2nd circuit, State of Louisiana has, in fact, ruled that this fraud calling itself the State of Louisiana does have standing and is committing a fraud on the face of the record. This fraud calling itself the State of Louisiana is not the issue of the appeal. The issue is the corruption and flagrant disregard for any law of God, man or the occupational government by their and your subordinates.

Your subordinates have eaten out our substance with their continued harassment and imprisonment. We are not paupers. We are victims of the corruption your lack of supervision has caused. If anyone doubts the word of Sovereigns, let them prove their claim.

Now, a curious problem arises. How do these victimized Sovereigns transmit this voluminous collection of corruption of subordinates to the supervisor? There is too much to be copied and shipped for our meager means. And, again, of what use is the copying and shipment of this information if the clerk is allowed to rule by summary judgment and return our material.

Considering the foregoing, these Sovereigns have decided to send the documents in electronic form. The Sovereigns have organized the documents for their own use and have, just like the courts, scanned the documents. To make their retrieval easier, these documents were incorporated into pages suitable for storage on the world wide web. We have copied our document storage system which we introduce as EXHIBIT A .

All documents are arranged by court, charge and date on the right side bar. All attempts to reach the one supreme Court of our Constitution, thwarted by the clerks of an inferior congressional court, and the summary judgments of the Clerk can be found under the various names I have tried to reach the one supreme Court created by our Constitution. There is even a document guide to lead you through the paperwork.

You can see the documentation of your inferior courts flat refusal to even divulge the jurisdiction they represent. You can see the documentation of your inferior courts flatly refusing to force our accusers to prove their vile, fraudulent, infamous charges against our overwhelming positive and irrefutable proof that our accusers were perpetrating a fraud. There is no doubt that our accusers have no valid cause of action, right of action, nor standing.

You can see the documentation of your inferior courts proceeding with these pretend charges absent even the pretense of jurisdiction. The worst crime a court can commit.

You can see the documentation of the collusion of the Court of Appeal, 5th Circuit, State of Louisiana with the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana as the try to bludgeon the Sovereign Michael E. DiRosa into slavery by way of a Negro court. Extending even to fraud on the face of the record in concocting a fictitious chain of appeal. Did the Court of Appeal, 5th Circuit, State of Louisiana issue a certified question as to the validity of Article VII Section 5 and hence the validity of the right of action? Of course not. No law of God or man is being followed in Louisiana.

You can see the blatant corruption echoed in the 26th judicial district court and the Court of Appeal, 2nd Circuit, State of Louisiana. The flat refusal to inform these Sovereigns as to what jurisdiction they stand and the flat refusal to demand that the accuser prove his cause of action, right of action and standing. And, least we forget, the seizure of jurisdiction by force absent even its pretense.

You can see the various attempts of these Sovereigns to locate and reach the one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested, created by our Constitution and correspondences between these Sovereigns and the clerks of your inferior court.

These Sovereigns do hereby certify that all documents are true and correct copies of the originals and further certify that the information in our document retrieval system introduced as EXHIBIT A is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, free of any harmful computer code.

Considering the foregoing, some questions will soon be answered. Is the inferior congressional court know as the Supreme Court of the United States so badly managed that the clerk can hide this information from them, or, are the justices of that court willing participants in the corruption hiding behind their clerk?

Neither option is pleasant to contemplate. However, not having been able to locate the one supreme Court of our Constitution and with the Bludgeoning of Sovereign Malinda Nicole DiRosa scheduled for January, these Sovereigns have been forced to prove either the incompetence or corruption of this inferior congressional court. Should no spark of honor be found in this court, the only option for these Sovereigns is to continue to educate our sworn allies. We have no choice but to continue to acquire as much proof as possible. Betrayal is a hard and bitter pill to swallow.

The above is certified to be true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief this 21st day of December, 2009

It is hereby certified that Michael E. DiRosa has signed the name of Malinda Nicole DiRosa in her stead and with full authority given. The only reason that Malinda Nicole DiRosa, a belligerent claimant in person, did not sign this document herself is solely because we are imprisoned in different parts of the State of Louisiana by the occupational government. If anyone doubts the word of Sovereigns, all they need do is ask.


Malinda Nicole DiRosa Michael E. DiRosa
Sovereign in proper person Sovereign in proper person
C/O 318 Lakeshore Pkwy. C/O 318 Lakeshore Pkwy.
New Orleans, Louisiana New Orleans, Louisiana
XXX - XXX - XXXX XXX - XXX - XXXX



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.

These Sovereigns have concluded that there is no one to serve for the following reasons:

      1. Notice to the principle is notice to the agents.

      2. As long time prisoners, under threat of arrest, imprisonment , extortion, confiscation and endless appearances if caught traveling even locally, we can no longer afford the expense.

      3. Should an investigation ensue, we do not wish to give the criminals any more opportunity than is absolutely necessary to alter, forge or destroy records as they have been known to do in the past.

      4. All other parties have had ample opportunity (years) to refute the claims of these Sovereigns and now must be estopped from any claim.

      5. These courts have no jurisdiction over these Sovereigns or the core issues. To not serve them is to be construed as a complete and total denial of any pretense of jurisdiction. And, until such time as proof of jurisdiction is offered, the uncontested proof of their lack of jurisdiction is the fact.

      6. There is only one court with a duty to perform, The inferior congressional Supreme Court of the United States. Stop this travesty being committed by your subordinates and submit these matters to the only Court of competent jurisdiction, the one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested created by our Constitution.

If anyone believes that someone needs to be served, speak up or forever hold your peace.


Malinda Nicole DiRosa Michael E. DiRosa
Sovereign in proper person Sovereign in proper person
C/O 318 Lakeshore Pkwy. C/O 318 Lakeshore Pkwy.
New Orleans, Louisiana New Orleans, Louisiana
XXX - XXX - XXXX XXX - XXX - XXXX


TOP
The Quest
Download the whole site.
Another Confession
The threat of the 14th amendment.

We have been showing you that:
1) The 14th Amendment stole our unalineable rights.
2) The story of the 14th Amendment is the story of the overthrow of the United States.

Here is a confession from the South Carolina Law Quarterly. They quote Andrew Johnson (President after Lincoln.) Will you believe them?

Why is this history different from the one you learned?

Another Confession. The threat of the 14th amendment.
LATEST 1/22/10
1/22/10
Objection to the inquisition
1/20/10
Trial - Statement of the Sovereign
12/30/09
U.S. Supreme Court
betrays us all,
again.
12/21/09
USSC Judicial Process
OSC Judicial Process
11/20/09
APPEAL Denied
10/23/09
APPEAL to the
Court of Appeal,
Second Circuit,
State of Louisiana.
9/23/09
The Rape of Dignity.
The Victim goes to court
172621-Statement of Accused -Court appearance
Our highest court has
"GONE MISSING"
More to come.
It's legal until the gavel slaps.
(When hell freezes over.)
Hell hasn't frozen, YET

Do you really think that someone is going to slap their head and and say; Oops you caught us? Who cares if one victim knows how he's being cheated? They've been cheating you since 1867.

JURY, SOVEREIGNS, ALLIES.
The evidence is before you.
Am I Right or Wrong?
Will the Jury please rise and
DECLARE THEIR VERDICT.
What can I do?
(Quietly - I have enough trouble.)
GUIDED TOUR
Through the courts
Supporting doc guide
SUPPORTING DOCS
U.S.C. title 28 Sec. 1251
U.S.C. title 28 Sec. 1254-1257
Scott v. Sandford
Slaughterhouse Cases
Hans v. Louisiana
The dubious origins of the
14th Amendment (jpg)
The threat of the
14th Amendment (jpg)
National Exchange Bank of Baltimore v. Peters
Louisiana Constitution Article I
Louisiana Constitution Article IV
Louisiana Constitution Article V
Louisiana Constitution Article VII
L.R.S. Ch. 9 Dept. of
Public Safety and Corrections

Times Picayune article 4/4/07 (jpg)
driver license application
front (jpg)
driver license application
back (jpg)
supreme Court
J.P.-Unable to assist - copy 9/30/09
H.C. Failed to make changes 9/30/09
Demand Process-Habeas Corpus 9/19/09
H.C. Certified Mail 9/19/09
Demand for Judicial Process 9/8/09
J.P. Certified Mail 9/8/09
Return amendment -copy 7/23/09
Note to scotus clerk 7/21/09
Note to supreme Court clerk 7/21/09
Return for S.A.S.E. 7/21/09
scotus-re-treason.jpg 7/20/09
scotus-re-mnd-2.jpg 7/20/09
scotus-re-mnd.jpg 7/17/09
amend habeas corpus 7/15/09
supreme note clerk 7/2/09
supreme treason 7/2/09
supreme-forma-pauperis 7/2/09
habeas_corpus 7/2/09
SECOND FRONT 26 JDC
Objection to inquisition 1/22/10
Trial - Statement of the Sovereign 1/20/10
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to help you. 12/30/09
USSC Judicial Process 12/21/09
OSC Judicial Process 12/21/09
2nd Circuit Appeal deny. 11/20/09
172621-Appeal 2nd Circuit. 10/23/09
172621-Statement of Accused -Court appearance 09/23/09
172621-Continuance and Particulars denied 07/24/09
172621-clerk-respond 07/20/09
172621-clerk-return 07/10/09
resend Habeas Corpus (text) 07/08/09
172621-clerk-return (jpg w/note) 07/08/09
172621-particulars 07/08/09
172621-continuance 07/08/09
Dismiss Denied 06/24/09
26 JDC: no jurisdiction 06/03/09
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
ussc: Louisiana - Treason 03/13/09
ussc: leave to file 10/11/07
ussc: original action 10/11/07
ussc: summons 10/11/07
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
scotus: Original Jurisdiction
  Leave to File
7/9/07
scotus: Original Jurisdiction 7/9/07
scotus: Does not comply (jpg) 7/13/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return 7/23/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return #2 8/3/07
Suter demand 8/3/07
scotus: OJ No Jurisdiction
orig (jpg)
8/21/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return #3 9/6/07
Suter demand #2 9/6/07
scotus: OJ apply to Scalia 9/6/07
scotus: OJ No assistance
orig
9/12/07
scotus: Scire Facias
 Leave to File
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias 9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias Exhibit A
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias Summons
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias No Assist copy (jpg) 9-28-07
9-12-07-sc-no-assist-1-2nd.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1-orig.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1-orig-pg2.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-2.jpg 9-12-07
sc-no-comply-.jpg 7-13-07
sc-nojur--orig.jpg 8-21-07
env-sc-postmark-.jpg 9-17-07
LA SUPREME COURT
131 La. Supreme
1/22/07
131 Sent proof of judgment
1/22/07
131 pleadings filed (jpg) 1/24/07
131 env (jpg) 1/25/07
131 transfer jurisdiction
 cover letter

3/5/07
131 transfer jurisdiction
3/5/07
131 transfer env. (jpg) 3/6/07
131 Object Transfer Jurisdiction
3/12/07
5th denies transfered "writ"(jpg)
3/12/07
5th denial envelope (jpg) 3/12/07
131 Object Ruling of the 5th 3/15/07
131 sent missing docs
cover letter
3/17/07
131 Objection returned (jpg)
 Transfer Jurisdiction
3/19/07
131 Object returned (jpg) env. 3/20/07
131 Object central staff 3/26/07
131 Brief in Support 3/30/07
866 Appeal 4/2/07
131 Demand Summary 4/13/07
131 Sent more copies 4/19/07
866 Pleadings filed 4/27/07
866 Object incorrect record 5/7/07
866 Demand Summary
  in open court
5/21/07
131 Demand Summary
  in open court
5/22/07
131 Return vehicle 5/23/07
866 Return vehicle 5/23/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 page 1
6/7/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 page 2
6/7/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 env
6/7/07
866 Deny "writ" (jpg) 1/25/08
F1523230, F1525159, F1678532
Summons JP-p57425 (jpg) 1/15/04
Internal affairs 20040112
 no inventory
1/15/04
Summons SP b7819915 (jpg) 2/4/04
Summons SP B8484588 (jpg) 11/16/06
Summons JP-R44686 (jpg) 12/21/06
Summons JP-R44687 (jpg) 12/21/06
Internal affairs 20061209
  arrest officer
12/21/06
Internal affairs 20061209
 detention
12/21/06
Dismiss want jurisdiction 12-28-06
F1523230 Contempt (jpg) 12/28/06
F1523230 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1525159 Contempt (jpg) 12/28/06
F1525159 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1678532 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1523230 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1525159 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1678532 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1523230 Trial Notice 2 (jpg) 2/28/07
F1678532 Trial Notice 2 (jpg) 2/28/07
New set of trial notices (jpg)
 trial on 10/28
7/30/08
F1523230 Space trials 08/26/08
F1525159 Space trials 08/26/08
F1678532 Space trials 08/26/08
F1523230 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1525159 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1678532 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1523230 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
F1525159 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
F1678532 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
f1523230-construct-notice 11/1/08
f1525159-construct-notice 11/1/08
f1678532-construct-notice 11/1/08
F1681551
F1681551 Improperly Set Court 12/28/06
F1681551 Jail house defense 1/22/07
F1681551 Arraignment 2/28/07
F1681551 Minutes (jpg) 2/28/07
F1681551 Clerk Receipt (jpg) 3/2/07
F1681551 Trial Notice (jpg) 3/2/07
F1681551 Particulars 4/6/07
F1681551 Jury and Witnesses 4/7/07
New set of trial notices (jpg)
 trial on 10/28
7/30/08
F1681551 Space Trials 8/26/08
F1681551 Formal Treason 9/16/08
F1681551 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
f1681551-construct-notice 11/1/08
Various docs
Withdraw Regis (jpg) 1/15/04
Wrecker Request (jpg) 1/15/04
returned vehicle (jpg) 1/22/04
Withdraw Registration (jpg) 12/21/06
Wrecker Request (jpg) 12/21/06
Won't return vehicle (jpg) 12/22/06
DPSC demand vehicle 1/22/07
Traffic court entry slip (jpg)  
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-1304-e
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-411
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-51
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-863-1
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 47-507
12/22/06
Bond Attach (jpg)
 F1523230
12/22/06
Bond Attach (jpg)
 F1525159
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851065d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851066d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851067d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851068d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851069d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851070d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851071d
12/22/06
This page was created by The Circle of Light Church (www.WeAreAstrologers.org)
Nobody necessarily agrees with anybody.
Copyright © The Circle of Light Church 2009