| STATE OF LOUISIANA |
) |
|
) ss |
| PARISH OF JEFFERSON |
) |
IN THE FIRST PARISH COURT
OF AND FOR THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
| STATE OF LOUISIANA, |
) |
|
) DOCKET NO: F1678532 |
| PLAINTIFF, |
) DIV. TRAFFIC |
|
) |
| VS |
) Still properly before the Louisiana Supreme Court, |
|
) illegally set, under docket number 2007-KH-131 |
| MICHAEL E. DiROSA, |
) |
| ACCUSED. |
) DEMAND FOR TIME TO PREPARE FOR THE STAR |
|
) CHAMBER PROCEEDING PRETENDING TO BE A LAWFUL |
|
) TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR THE TWENTY-EIGHT DAY OF |
|
) OCTOBER, 2008 ABSENT EVEN THE PRETENSE OF |
|
) JURISDICTION OF THE COURT AND DESPITE CLEAR AND |
|
) UNCONTESTED PROOF THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS NO |
|
) STANDING, CAUSE OF ACTION NOR RIGHT OF ACTION |
|
) IN THIS MATTER AND DESPITE CLEAR AND |
|
) UNDISPUTED PROOF THAT THE PLAINTIFF AND |
|
) DISTRICT ATTORNEY, IN COLLUSION, ARE |
|
) PERPETRATING A FRAUD UPON THIS DEFENDANT AND |
|
) THIS COURT |
Stands
before this court, Michael E. DiRosa, a Sovereign Citizen of the
State of Louisiana, an uncontested fact, bought before this court by
force of arms to defend himself against vile and infamous charges,
brought by fraud and deceit, before this court, lacking jurisdiction.
This
Defendant, Michael E. DiRosa, Sovereign Citizen of the State of
Louisiana, does hereby demand that this court, lacking jurisdiction,
allow this Defendant more time to prepare for the Star Chamber
proceedings pretending to be a lawful trial scheduled for the 28th
day of October, 2008, absent even the pretense of jurisdiction of the
court and despite clear and uncontested proof that the plaintiff has
no standing, cause of action nor right of action in this matter and
despite clear and undisputed proof that the plaintiff and district
attorney, in collusion, are perpetrating a fraud upon this defendant
and this court.
It
must be pointed out to this court that it has scheduled four trials
for the same date and time and it is physically impossible for this
Defendant to adequately defend himself.
NOTICE OF ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT
AND
IMMINENT DANGER OF DEATH
I
do hereby notice this court that I am currently illegally imprisoned
and condemned to death, absent charge and trial, awaiting my
executioner. This prison is as real and confining as any made of
brick and steel. I am forbidden by law the right to own and use any
"device by which persons or things may be transported upon a public
highway or bridge." La R.S. 32:1(92) Hence, the bounding wall of
this prison is at the distance that I can walk in a day, or half of
that distance if a habitat is maintained, carrying my possessions on
my person or in a push cart. This prison also includes the penalty of
time required in transit. This is slightly better than house arrest
and I have termed it "walking distance prison." I am only allowed
to exceed the bounds of my prison if I beg or pay a slave / bond
servant of the State of Louisiana to escort me. I am also forbidden,
by the gun barrel of the State of Louisiana, from owning or operating
an emergency evacuation vehicle. When the next nature sent or man
made disaster should befall this area I am to be left here to die for
I have been denied ownership or use of any means of escape. By the
grace of God, I have already bested three executioners, hurricanes
Katrina and Rita and the man made levy debacle and flood. My next
executioner may come as soon as tomorrow. My very life is at stake
and I have been forced to institute this action from my walking
distance prison, in haste. Law libraries and my previous research are
beyond the bounds of my prison.
NOTICE OF IGNORANCE OF THE LAW
This
defendant does rebut the presumption that this Defendant does know
and understand the law. This Defendant has little better than a high
school education and has had no formal training in law and is barely
competent in the use of colloquial English and has had no formal
training in the dialect of the English language known colloquially as
legalese. This Defendant does even rebut the presumption of knowledge
of the law as the State of Louisiana has mandated the high school
curriculum and has not seen fit to include even the basics of law
therein. Hence, the State of Louisiana is culpable in my ignorance of
law. Considering the culpability of the State of Louisiana in my
ignorance of law, I do challenge the presumption that I know and
understand the law as no such instruction is available in the State
of Louisiana's own schools. On what facts can this presumption of law
rest?
On the
first day of August I received notices, by mail, in the same
envelope, that the cases bearing docket numbers F1678532, F1523230,
F1525159, F1681551, are set for trial on the twenty-eighth day of
October, 2008 at 5 o'clock pm. Further notice, in the same envelope
as the other notices, did inform me that I am to pay One Hundred
Dollars and no cents on that day as an installment on each of the One
Hundred Dollars and no cents assessed against me for each of the
rulings of contempt against me rendered in cases F1523230 and
F1525159. Imagine my surprise. All action in these cases has been
stayed by order of the Court until such time as the Louisiana Supreme
Court ruled on the validity of the admiralty lien on which I am being
prosecuted as a trespasser on the alleged property of the State of
Louisiana. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Louisiana
Supreme Court has not made any ruling on the validity of the
admiralty lien, nor has it made any ruling on the validity of the
exclusive agent of the State's alleged property and complainant known
as the Department of Public Safety and Corrections. These cases are
properly before the Louisiana Supreme Court referenced on that Docket
as 2007-KH-131 and 2007-KH-866, unfortunately, the Louisiana Supreme
Court is illegally set. Cases F1678532, F1523230, F1525159 are
under review by the illegally set Louisiana Supreme Court under
docket number 2007-KH-131. Case F1681551 is under review by the
illegally set Louisiana Supreme Court under docket number
2007-KH-866.
Surely,
this must have been a clerical error. I did expect to receive a
retraction by mail. When no such retraction arrived, I had begun to
formulate an answer to point out the clerical errors to the court.
Not least of which being that the courts own and exclusive record of
my innocence of the contempt charges has been intentionally hidden by
the court to hide the illegality of my arrest and detention in
prison.
On the
11th day of August a person did appear at the door of a
bona fide residence in the State of Louisiana and did further notice
me that on the 28th day of October, 2008, at five o'clock,
four trial will be held, one for each of the aforementioned cases.
Besides
the physical impossibility of having four separate trial at the same
time and place, it is incumbent upon this Defendant to point out to
this court that:
It
is an uncontested fact that I, Michael E. DiRosa am a Citizen of
the State of Louisiana with clear title to my Life, my Liberty and
my pursuit of Happiness , among other property. This title is
traceable to my Creator, as I rule my kingdom by divine right as
guaranteed by the United States Declaration of Independence.
It
is an uncontested fact that the once Sovereign State of Louisiana
was invaded by citizens of another state, aliens to the State of
Louisiana, at the point of a bayonet, and that these invaders now
rule only by right of conquest contrary to Article 4 Section 4 of
the United States Constitution.
It
is an uncontested fact that there has not been one legal act or
treaty instituted by the United States Congress or the Legislature
of the State of Louisiana since the illegal overthrow of the State
of Louisiana and the United States of America by the
Reconstruction act and the resulting 14th amendment to
the United States Constitution.
It
is an uncontested fact that the co-conspirators to the overthrow
of the State of Louisiana, at the point of a bayonet, have
conspired to persecute Michael E. DiRosa, with malice certain,
through fraud, deceit, theft and illegal imprisonment.
It
is an uncontested fact that the Governor, the Attorney General,
and all of the legislators, State and Federal are unfit to hold
office except by right of Conquest.
It
is an uncontested fact that the First Parish Court, Parish of
Jefferson, State of Louisiana is withholding exculpatory evidence
in connection with all of the charges against me including the two
different contempt charges .
It
is a fact the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of
Louisiana has no jurisdiction in this matter. A fact well known
to the multiple district attorneys and judges of that court. To
date there has been no showing of proof of any kind that this
court has jurisdiction or that the Plaintiff has standing, despite
clear and irrefutable proof to the contrary. In fact, the judges
have even refused to even inform this Defendant as to what type of
Court and in what jurisdiction he does stand despite numerous and
continuous demands for this basic information.
These
and many other appeals, objections and exceptions were served on all
parties concerned, in the courts in which the Defendant sought
relief. I do hereby include all such paperwork into this document as
if fully contained within as all deal with the lack of Jurisdiction
of this court, the lack of standing, cause of action and right of
action of the Plaintiff.
These
included documents were filed in the Louisiana Supreme Court under
docket number 2007-KH-131 complaining of the lack of jurisdiction of
the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana and
the lack of standing, cause of action and right of action of the
Plaintiff in cases numbered F1678532, F1523230, F1525159 on the
Docket of the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of
Louisiana.
WRIT OF ERROR
AND/OR APPEAL
OBJECTION TO
THE TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
LOUISIANA TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT AND
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
OBJECTION TO THE RULING ENTITLED
"APPLICATION FOR WRITS NO. '07-KH-154 COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH
CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA." AND MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
OBJECTION TO THE RETURN OF LEGALLY FILED
DOCUMENTS AND ADJUDGEMENTS BY THE CENTRAL STAFF OF THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT
ORIGINAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL TO THE
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF LOUISIANA ARTICLE VII SECTION 5 OF THE
LOUISIANA STATE CONSTITUTION IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
DEMAND FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND WRIT OF
MANDAMUS
MOTION FOR ADJUDGMENT ON THE UNCONTESTED
FACTS THAT ARTICLE VII SECTION 5 OF THE LOUISIANA STATE CONSTITUTION
IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NULL AND VOID FROM ITS INCEPTION AND THE
ADJUDGMENT THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS BE
DISSOLVED AS ILLEGALLY INSTITUTED CONTRARY TO THE LOUISIANA STATE
CONSTITUTION.
EMERGENCY
MOTION FOR THE RETURN OF MY VEHICLE, AND / OR THE PERSONAL PROPERTY
CONTAINED THEREIN, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THERE IS A RULING ON THE
VALIDITY OF THE CONTESTED LIEN
These
included documents were filed in the Louisiana Supreme Court under
docket number 2007-KH-866 complaining of the lack of jurisdiction of
the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana and
the lack of standing, cause of action and right of action of the
Plaintiff in case numbered F1681551 on the Docket of the First
Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana.
EMERGENCY
APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF LOUISIANA AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS
OBJECTION TO
ERRORS ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD
MOTION FOR
ADJUDGMENT ON THE UNCONTESTED FACTS THAT ARTICLE VII SECTION 5 OF THE
LOUISIANA STATE CONSTITUTION IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NULL AND VOID
FROM ITS INCEPTION AND THE ADJUDGMENT THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS BE DISSOLVED AS ILLEGALLY INSTITUTED CONTRARY
TO THE LOUISIANA STATE CONSTITUTION.
EMERGENCY
MOTION FOR THE RETURN OF MY VEHICLE, AND / OR THE PERSONAL PROPERTY
CONTAINED THEREIN, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THERE IS A RULING ON THE
VALIDITY OF THE CONTESTED LIEN.
These
documents were served on the Supreme Court of the United States and
the United States Supreme Court. This Defendant did believe that the
Supreme Court of the United States was the same court referenced by
Publius and in Article III of the United States Constitution. There
is now doubt in the mind of the Defendant. It is now believed that
the Supreme Court of the United States may be a congressional court.
However, all attempts at redress of grievance to the co-conspirators,
under any alias, have been returned by summary judgment of the Clerk
of those courts. Evidently the co-conspirators believe that the
overthrow of the United States, at the point of a bayonet, was a
legal act, which now must be upheld.
MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE THE ATTACHED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF THE
COMPLAINT IN FORMA PAUPERIS.
COMPLAINT AND
BRIEFS IN SUPPORT
OBJECTION TO
THE RETURN OF LEGALLY FILED DOCUMENTS.
SECOND
OBJECTION TO THE RETURN OF LEGALLY FILED DOCUMENTS.
THIRD OBJECTION
TO THE RETURN OF LEGALLY FILED DOCUMENTS.
SCIRE FACIAS
COMPLAINT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE THE ATTACHED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF THE
COMPLAINT IN FORMA PAUPERIS.
ORIGINAL
CRIMINAL DEFENSE,COMPLAINTS AND BRIEFS IN SUPPORT.
This
is to be construed as a short list of the documents included within
this document. There are also numerous demands made on this court in
particular which have never been answered and still await ruling by
the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana.
Yet,
it is evident by the unusual action of personal service of the
notices of trial that this court is fully aware of its lack of
jurisdiction in this matter and plans to persecute the Defendant,
Michael E. DiRosa, regardless of the law and facts. This court knows
that it doesn't even have the pretense of jurisdiction.
To
make matters worse, this court does know that it is persecuting the
Defendant, intentionally and willfully, to hide the fact that the
judges in the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of
Louisiana, the Louisiana Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the
United States are, in collusion, are willfully and intentionally
perpetuating the overthrow of the United States of America and the
forced enslavement of all of the Sovereign Citizens of the States
United.
Harsh
words. The terms collusion, accessory after the fact,
co-conspirator, slaver and traitor come to mind, among others.
Obviously,
the Defendant would have to be a fool to make such a claim without
proof. I do now submit as evidence the attached confession of the
band of sworn associates who have actively conspired to perpetuate
the overthrow of the United States of America, at the point of a
bayonet. Attached is a copy of the "Dubious Origins of the
Fourteenth Amendment". Tulane Law Review Vol. 28 ,1953 (Exh DO14)
This copy was obtained by making a copy of the appropriate pages of
the Tulane Law Review found in the Louisiana Supreme Court's law
library.
There
are other law reviews that tell the same story, but I chose to
include this version for some obvious reasons. First is the fact
that this is a Louisiana Publication recounting a speech made before
the members of the Conspiracy. Secondly, it happens that the Chief
Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court was the publisher of a rival
publication just a few years prior. There can be no doubt that he is
well aware of the contents of this confession and may even been
present when the speech was given. Even if the presumption of
knowledge of the law could be avoided, the other facts are
indisputable.
Why
would the members of this heinous conspiracy to defraud, not only the
living Sovereign Citizens of this Country, but also the Citizens long
dead, confess? As it turns out they were trying to blackmail the
Supreme Court of the United States into keeping the African race more
subjugated than the rest of the subjugated population.
Members
of the bar, sworn associates all, know that the Fourteenth Amendment
to our Constitution was forced upon this country at the point of a
bayonet. Members of the bar, sworn associates all, know that the
Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution stole our right to be born a
Sovereign Citizen of a State and reduced us all to the status of
freed slave. The character of Dred Scott, the butchers and Hans.
Members of the bar, sworn associates all, know that the one remaining
avenue to attaining the status of Sovereign Citizen of the State of
Louisiana, a bona fide residence in the State of Louisiana, has been
stolen from us by an illegal cession of land.
Members
of the bar, sworn associates all, know that my rights and the rights
of all Citizens of the States United have been stolen as surely as
the rights of Dred Scott's ancestors were stolen in Africa. Yet,
they remain silent. Worse yet, they fully intend, with malice
certain, to persecute this Defendant to hide their secret. There can
be no doubt that they are co-conspirators in the overthrow of the
United States of America. How proud their ancestors and family must
be.
This
Defendant does fear for his very life. This Defendant is still
illegally imprisoned, forbidden, by law, to even flee for his life as
we are again in another hurricane season and hurricanes have been off
of our coast.
This
Defendant does fear for his life in that it is obvious that these
co-conspirators in the overthrow of the United States of America do
intend to persecute this Defendant even in defiance of the rules of
the invading army that they represent. Would these co-conspirators
even kill me to hide their treasonous acts? Their disregard for
human life was clearly demonstrated in the last hurricanes and the
flooding of the City of New Orleans. What's one more life on their
lack of conscience?
There
can be no doubt that this Defendant is headed for a Star Chamber
proceeding. In such a proceeding, the Defendant is to be doomed, law
and facts be damned. A fact our founding fathers were well aware of.
When one group of sworn associates gets control of the legislature,
our courts and the police no one is safe.
"The complete independence of the courts of justice is
peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited
Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified
exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that
it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the
like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other
way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must
be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the
Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular
rights or privileges would amount to nothing." Publius, The
Federalist No. 78
It
now has become apparent that the co-conspirators in the overthrow of
the United States of America are going to sacrifice this Defendant to
hide their heinous acts. To allow them to continue to get rich off
of the backs of all Americans. It is time to ask all concerned are
you a co-conspirator or a collaborator in the overthrow of the United
States of America?
After
all, it must be remembered, that Hitler did not overthrow Germany all
by himself. Hitler didn't kill all of those people all by himself.
Hitler did not invade all of those countries all by himself. Hitler
did not kill all of the Jews by himself.
There
can be no doubt that the right to use the gifts of our Creator have
been stolen. The rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness, among others, have been stolen. The very things this
country was instituted to protect. Sovereign Citizens of the States
United have been reduced to freed slaves by a band of conspirators
and conspirators have conspired to perpetuate that crime. To
actively enslave at least 250 million people.
There
can be no doubt that the overthrow of the United States of America
was a conspiracy conducted at the point of a bayonet. The question
is now are you a conspirator or are you part of the solution? Every
individual must now ask themselves that question.
Am
I going to continue to be a part of the enslavement of my fellow
countrymen, my parents, my brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles,
and even my children. Or, am I going to do my part, however small,
to bring this tyranny to an end?
Am
I going to take the short sighted heathen attitude that it is better
to serve the Devil than to stand in his path. Am I going to stand
before my Creator as part of the problem or as part of the solution.
This is between you and your Creator.
After
all, I didn't kill all of those people in the hurricanes and flood, I
just helped take away their vehicle. I didn't kill those people on
the Danzinger bridge, the new master has a right to treat his slaves
like that. I didn't cause those people any extra suffering, I just
processed the paperwork that closed the bridge and kept silent. I
didn't take all of those children from a whole town full of people, I
just did nothing. I didn't kill the Jews, I just rounded them up and
put them on the train. I didn't conspire to enslave my family and
fellow countrymen, I just processed the paperwork and kept my mouth
shut. To take no action is an action.
Since
it is apparent that the court does intend to hold a Star Chamber
proceeding absent not only the appearance of jurisdiction but also
despite clear and undisputed facts that conclusively prove that this
court does not have jurisdiction. I have no choice but to defend.
Since
it is apparent that the court does intend to hold a Star Chamber
proceeding absent not only the appearance of standing of the
Plaintiff, but also despite clear and undisputed proof that the
Plaintiff has no Standing. I have no choice but to defend.
Since it is apparent that the court does intend to hold a Star
Chamber proceeding absent not only the appearance of a valid cause of
action of the Plaintiff, but also despite clear and undisputed proof
that the Plaintiff has no valid cause of action. I have no choice
but to defend.
Since it is apparent that the court does intend to hold a Star
Chamber proceeding absent not only the appearance of a right of
action of the Plaintiff, but also despite clear and undisputed proof
that the Plaintiff has no valid right of action. I have no choice
but to defend.
Whereas
the documents included by reference do specifically deal with the
lack of Jurisdiction of the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson,
State of Louisiana and do deal with the lack of standing, cause of
action and right of action of the Plaintiff, they are specifically
included. However, this is as far as these documents go. Each one
of the four trials, scheduled for the same date and time, are charges
of different infamous crimes allegedly committed at different places
and times and under different circumstances and involve different
witnesses.
If
these soulless agents of the conquering army wish to continue the
pretense of the legality of these proceedings, I have no choice but
to defend. However, any infamous charge brought against me is a
serious matter. I do hereby demand that these trials be scheduled
for different dates and times so that I may address each charge with
the vigor and diligence clearing my good name deserves.
Each
trial has different circumstances. Each trial has different parties
involved. Each trial has different discovery documents which must be
prepared. Each trial has different questions that must be prepared
for the different witnesses. Each trial has a different witness list
and subpoenas to be prepared. Pretrial motions and exceptions must
be prepared individually for each trial. Three of these cases
(F1678532, F1523230, F1525159) are under Docket Number 2007-KH-131
properly before the Louisiana Supreme Court, illegally set, with the
State of Louisiana as the sole respondent and one of these cases
(F1681551) is under Docket Number 2007-KH-866 with the Department of
Public Safety and Corrections, a body corporate with the power to sue
and be sued, as the sole respondent. Only the lack of jurisdiction
of the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana
and the lack of standing, cause of action and right of action of the
Plaintiff are the same. These trials must be handled separately with
equal dignity and solemnity afforded to each as infamous charges
demand. Even in the star chambers and Inquisition form was
preserved.
The
illegally set Louisiana Supreme Court had illegally tried to
selectively conjoin the two cases (2007-KH-131 and 2007-KH-866), over
never answered and uncontested objections, to match the fictitious
chain of appeal they had created in case 2007-KH-131 and have, to
date, only denied this Appellants repeated motions for summary
judgment in one case. To date there has been no answer from the
different Respondents in either case.
Surely,
it can't be a matter of time. Cases F1523230 and F1525159 have been
ongoing cases since March 16, 2004, when I first appeared before the
First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, as a
Citizen of the State of Louisiana. The judge, in that instance,
knowing that he did not have jurisdiction, threw me out of the court
with no return date specified. The court's own record proves the
truth of my statements, yet judge Levinson hid this exculpatory
evidence and convicted me of contempt, despite clear evidence that I
was innocent, to hide the illegality of my arrest.
I
next appeared before the First Parish Court, Parish of Jefferson,
State of Louisiana on the 28th day of December, 2006 when
I was found in contempt of court, despite exculpatory evidence, to
hide the fact that I was illegally arrested on the 21st
day of December, 2006 and held incognito until my fingerprints and
picture were stolen from me to be used as evidence against me.
On
January 22, 2007 I did mail my appeal directly to the Louisiana
Supreme Court where it was duly docketed as docket number 2007-KH-131
on the 24th day of January, 2007. I had appealed directly
to the Louisiana Supreme Court in accordance with Article V section
5(D)(1) of the Louisiana Constitution and because it is the only
Louisiana Court that could rule on the validity of a Louisiana
Constitutional Article. In combined acts of malfeasance, misfeasance
and nonfeasance in violation of State law, Federal law, and their own
rules, the case still languishes to this day. To date there has been
no reply from the State of Louisiana.
On
March 2, 2007 I did appear for arraignment on charges with docket
number F1681551. On April 2, 2007 I did mail my appeal directly to
the Louisiana Supreme Court where it was duly docketed as docket
number 2007-KH-866 on the 27th day of April, 2007. I had
appealed directly to the Louisiana Supreme Court in accordance with
Article V section 5(D)(1) of the Louisiana Constitution and because
it is the only Louisiana Court that could rule on the validity of a
Louisiana Constitutional Article. In combined acts of malfeasance,
misfeasance and nonfeasance in violation of State law, Federal law,
and their own rules, the case still languishes to this day. To date
there has been no response from the Department of Public Safety and
Corrections, a body corporate with the power to sue and be sued,
Could
it be that the scheduling of all four trials at the same date and
time was an attempt to hide the fabricated chain of appeal created in
the Louisiana Supreme Court and further hide what the Louisiana
Supreme Court illegally did, over uncontested objections never
answered. Only a conjoining of these actions would give the
appearance of legality to the Louisiana Supreme Court's fabricated
chain of appeal.
Surely
this couldn't be the case. Men, honorable by decree, would not stoop
so low. Would they? But, then again, it's good to be the ruling
class, esquires of the illegitimate King of the United States of
America.
Wouldn't
it be embarrassing to have a higher court call up the whole record to
find that this Defendant has never been in the courts of the
fraudulent chain of appeal. Is it any wonder that this Defendant,
illegally imprisoned for almost two years, does fear for his life and
safety, besides the natural disasters from which this Defendant is
forbidden to flee.
What
a dilemma. What would the United States Supreme Court do? On the
one hand it is bound, under the pretense of following the intent of
the original framers of the Constitution, to give full faith and
credit to all official State Documents. Yet, there is positive and
irrefutable proof that the documents produced by the Louisiana
Supreme Court are fraudulent. What will they do?
Of
course, United States Supreme Court's Justices are aware that the
Sovereign Citizens of all States have been overthrown and now have
the character of a freed slave. The numerous justices of the United
States Supreme Court have known of the overthrow of the Sovereign
Citizens of the United State of America, at the point of a bayonet,
since its inception and have chosen to be active participants.
The
fact of the overthrow of all of the Sovereign Citizens of every State
has been apparent since the Butchers were declared freed slaves in
the Slaughterhouse cases and since the court and the co-conspiring
lawyer for Hans argued over ability of Hans to sue the State of
Louisiana as a person with the character of a freed slave.
This
fact is further evidenced in that all documents sent to the United
States Supreme Court have been returned by summary judgment of the
Clerk of Court who has repeatedly ruled that this Defendant has the
character of a freed slave, despite undisputed evidence to the
contrary and despite the fact that this is one of the main points of
contention in all of the paper word sent to that once noble court.
And, of course, over repeated objections, demands and even threats.
There
can be no doubt. The only reason for not allowing the requested
extension of time by the expansion of the trial dates is to assist
the Louisiana Supreme Court is the fraud it is perpetrating not only
on this Defendant, but on all Sovereign Citizens everywhere. And,
furthermore, allow the once noble United States Supreme Court to
blindly say, with the color of law, that on the face of the record
the Defendant is wrong.
Everyone
is aware of the correctness of my position. Everyone is aware of the
correctness of my legal form. The only thing that is allowing the
perpetuation of the enslavement of the Sovereign Citizens of the
States United, the Kings of the various States, is your active
participation. There are many religious references to a King and his
minions who rule by deception. It may be time to choose sides.
There
can be no doubt. Only the correctness of my position and legal
approach would reduce the Louisiana Supreme Court to acts of fraud to
hide the truth. Why else would the clerk of the Louisiana Supreme
Court order the physical ejection of this Defendant, in violation of
their own rules, to prevent him from filing a motion in open court as
he had done, in an orderly fashion, each of the prior two days? Why
else would a mere Clerk of the United States Supreme Court be allowed
to issue summary judgment on the plight of one of those darkies
trying to reclaim his Kingdom from a Tyrant?
Is
there any wonder that I fear for my life. One must question the
death of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln, a self taught lawyer himself,
would have never condoned the overthrow of his beloved Union as
Johnson did. With that in mind, I do notice the court that I am not
the piper, but I do seem to be carrying his invoice.
I
have found my birthright to be a Sovereign Citizen of the State of
Louisiana, a king in the State of Louisiana. What a cruel joke was
Huey Long. Every man a King. It used to be true, but he was just
laughing at us. It's mine and I want it. Just as Dred Scott tried
to do, I am here to "assert the title of himself and his family to
freedom." Scott v. Sandford 60 U.S. 393
I
exist as a free man by divine right as guaranteed in our Declaration
of Independence. It's mine and I want it. How dare you steal it
from me under color of law. If you have nothing to hide why is the
true story of the overthrow of the United States of America a secret?
The Tyrant has, with his co-conspirators, stolen everything of
value from me except my life and left me to languish is this walking
distance prison. I will live free or die. It is required by the
Creator that I make use of his gifts. What profit a man to gain the
whole world and loose his immortal soul?
I will not go away. It's mine and I DEMAND it. I am here to
reclaim my Kingdom as a Sovereign Citizen of the State of Louisiana.
I am here to assert the title to myself and my family and, thereby,
free my fellow Sovereign Citizens and sworn allies from the Tyrants
that have enslaved us.
Daddy
did you really put more people in jail than Stalin and Lennon? No,
my child, I only helped. Daddy, did you really enslave all of your
own family and countrymen? No, my child, I only helped. Daddy, did
you really steal more property than Hitler? No, my child, I only
helped. How proud your family must be.
One
must wonder for what deficiency of character does the LSAT test?
However,
if this court is going to continue to prosecute, I have no choice but
to defend.
Considering
the foregoing I have prepared a schedule of trail dates. These trial
dates are spaced about 120 days apart with pretrial documents due
about 90 days from the trial date. This will give the Defendant
approximately 30 days to prepare his pretrial documents and 90 days
for the court to settle any pretrial documents and still have ample
time to prepare for trial. The pretrial documents for the next case
would then be due 30 days after the last trial. With, again, 90 days
to settle all pretrial documents and ample time to prepare for trial
before the next pretrial motions would be due, and the cycle repeats.
It must be remembered that these alleged offenses happened as long
as four years ago. So much for a speedy trial. But then again, no
law of God or man has been followed in these proceedings.
Considering
the forgoing, this Defendant has prepared a list of trial dates and
deadlines for pretrial documents to be served for each case. This
Defendant must state that he is having trouble matching the correct
summonses of the officers to the appropriate trial docket numbers as
the list of charges do not match the notices of trial. However, one
kangaroo is as good as another so I have used the order of the
stapled Notices of Trial hand delivered to a bona fide residence in
the State of Louisiana by an officer of the invading army. This
Defendant will have to file discovery documents to make sure that he
is preparing a defense for the correct complaint and circumstances.
Docket
Number F1523230
Trial
to be held on the 4th day of December, 2008
Pretrial documents due on the 30th day of
September, 2008
Docket
Number F1525159
Trial on the
6th day of April, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 5th day of January, 2009
Docket
Number F1678532
Trial on the
5th day of August, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 6th day of May, 2009
Docket
Number F1681551
Trial on the
2nd day of December, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 7th day of September, 2009
To
date, the various district attorneys have remained silent and have
never even appeared before this or any court in any of these cases.
This Defendant does not expect them to break their record and raise
any objection to this proposed change of trial dates.
However,
should an objection be raised, it must be remembered that these cases
have dragged on these many years through no fault of this Defendant.
Surely, there can be no objection, now, after so long a silence by
the district attorneys, to this Defendant's demand for his right to
time.
This
Defendant does again notice the court of his continuous objections to
the Court's lack of Jurisdiction and the lack of cause of action,
right of action and standing of the Plaintiff in these cases.
Uncontested facts of which this court is well aware as it commits the
most grievous act a court can commit.
"And
certainly an error in passing a judgment upon the merits in favor of
either party, in a case which it was not authorized to try, and over
which it had no jurisdiction, is as grave an error as a court can
commit." Scott v. Sandford 60 U.S. 393
However,
one can not deny the power of the invading army. If they insist on
bringing these matters to trial, contrary to the laws of man and God.
I have no choice but to defend.
It
must also be remembered that this Defendant is currently illegally
imprisoned and has been illegally imprisoned since the 21st
day of December, 2006. Forbidden by the law of the invading army to
even flee for his life. Law libraries are beyond the bounds of his
prison and, in fact, the closest law library to this Defendant is the
Library in the Louisiana Supreme Court building. However, this
Defendant has already been bodily ejected, illegally, from this
building once and does fear the repeat of the experience. If the
pretense of Legality is to be preserved, this Defendant must be given
the additional time to defend his good name.
May
God save the Sovereign people, Kings one and all.
I,
Michael E. DiRosa, Sovereign Citizen of the State of Louisiana, do
hereby certify that the above is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief this 26th day of August, 2008.
Michael E.
DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New Orleans,
LA. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I,
Michael E. DiRosa, a Sovereign Citizen of the State of Louisiana, do
hereby certify that I have delivered one original, for the court, and
one true copy, for the district attorney, of this document by
entrusting it to he care of the United States Postal Authority,
properly addressed and postage prepaid, certified, return receipt
requested this 26th day of August, 2008.
Michael E.
DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New Orleans,
LA. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
ORDER
Considering
the foregoing, It is hereby ORDERED that the trial for this case,
Docket number F1678532 on the Docket of the First Parish Court,
Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana be stayed indefinitely
pending the return of a Legitimate Government in the State of
Louisiana.
It
is further ORDERED that all property taken from this Defendant,
Michael E. DiRosa, be returned immediately, at the expense of the
body corporate known as the Department of Public Safety and
Corrections.
It
is further ORDERED that the body corporate known as the Department of
Public Safety and Corrections and it's minions, be restrained from
laying hands on Michael E. DiRosa, a Sovereign Citizen of the State
of Louisiana.
This
____________ day of _________________________, 2008
_________________________________
JUDGE
ORDER
Considering
the foregoing, It is hereby ORDERED that the trial for this case,
Docket number F1678532 on the Docket of the First Parish Court,
Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana be moved in accordance with
the trial schedule listed below.
Docket
Number F1523230
Trial
to be held on the 4th day of December, 2008
Pretrial documents due on the 30th day of
September, 2008
Docket
Number F1525159
Trial on the
6th day of April, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 5th day of January, 2009
Docket
Number F1678532
Trial on the
5th day of August, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 6th day of May, 2009
Docket
Number F1681551
Trial on the
2nd day of December, 2009
Pretrial
documents due on the 7th day of September, 2009
This
____________ day of _________________________, 2008
_________________________________
JUDGE
TOP
|
