TWENTY-SIXTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
STATE
OF LOUISIANA
PARISH
OF BOSSIER
| STATE OF LOUISIANA, |
) CRIMINAL DOCKET NO.: 172,621, 172,622, |
|
) 172,623 |
| PLAINTIFF, |
) |
|
) |
| VS |
) |
|
) |
| MALINDA NICOLE DiROSA, |
) NOTICE OF POSITION OF THE ACCUSED, |
|
) CONTINUED OBJECTION TO THE JURISDICTION OF |
| FRAUDULENTLY ACCUSED |
) THIS COURT, THE CAUSE OF ACTION, RIGHT OF |
|
) ACTION, AND STANDING OF THE PLAINTIFF AND |
|
) FURTHER PROOF OF FRAUD AND TREASON. |
Forced
by the gun barrel of the occupational government to stand before this
mockery of justice to answer these pretend charges stands Malinda
Nicole DiRosa, a Sovereign, shanghaied at birth by the foreign
government before which she stands.
This
Sovereign, Malinda Nicole DiRosa, does, again and continuously,
challenge the jurisdiction of this court, the cause of action, right
of action, and standing of the plaintiff and does enter into the
record further proof of the fraud being perpetrated against her and
further proof of Treason against the Citizens of the State of
Louisiana by all parties conspiring to defraud this Sovereign.
Attached
and to be entered as Exhibit SCTraitor is a second confession of the treasonous overthrow of the State of Louisiana by the occupational
government before which I stand. The article entitled "THE 14TH
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNTIED STATES AND THE THREAT
THAT IT POSES TO OUR DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT" was published in the
South Carolina Law Quarterly Vol. 11 Pages 484 through 519 [1959]
and does mirror the description of the overthrow of the State of
Louisiana as published in the Louisiana Bar Association Journal, vol.
1, no. 2 and the Tulane Law Review Vol. XXVIII pages 22 through 44
[1953] entitled "THE DUBIOUS ORIGINS OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT" which is already a part of the record.
This
Sovereign and Sovereign Michael E. DiRosa have many times sought
redress of grievance to the Supreme Court of the Untied States and
they have betrayed us repeatedly.
It
is a confessed, undisputed and historical fact that our nation was
overthrown when a band of Treasonous conspirators overthrew congress,
illegally enacted the reconstruction act, invaded 10 States and
changed our national Constitution to enslave a once free people. It
is self-evident and also confessed in "THE 14TH
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNTIED STATES AND THE THREAT
THAT IT POSES TO OUR DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT" that the overthrow of
the United States could have never succeeded nor continued without
the complicity, then and now, of the Supreme Court of the United
States who have allowed this enslavement to continue. Their defense
is that the Traitors told them not to rule on how illegal all of this
is. Their just following the rules the Traitors dictated.
Nor
could this travesty of all this country claims to stands for be
continued without the willing participation of these sworn hypocrites
of the Bar pretending the right to beat the enslaved by virtue of
Treasonous conquest and deceit. Indeed they are proud to be
overseers of the master as they betray their families, their
neighbors and even sell their own children into slavery.
Considering the foregoing and the history of this case, as well as many others,
it is obvious that no law of God or man will be followed by these
petty tyrants. This mockery of a court, absent even the pretense of
right, will proceed with these pretend charges. Of what purpose is a
further defense? The fix is in as they say.
This
mockery calling itself a court knows that this Sovereign is not
familiar with the forked tongue, which has become the language of
treason, spoken in these chambers. Yet, this court has refused me
the assistance of my interpreter. This mockery of a court has even
ordered the use of a Judas Goat known as a public defender to help
apply the color of law. Can there be any doubt that a conviction is
assured? Convictions on charges so fraudulent that this mockery of a
court will not even state the particulars of the charges. Can there
be any doubt that a conviction is assured?
Considering the foregoing and the history of this case, as well as many others,
it is obvious that the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, State of
Louisiana will continue to betray us all, however, as that is the
next step, this Sovereign does notice this mockery of a Court of her
intention to appeal on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, among
others, and does demand that a return date be set as is required by
law and that any action taken by this mockery of a court be stayed
pending appeal.
I do hereby certify
that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief and that my position has been correctly translated into the
language of the court by my translator and next friend and paternal
parent Michael E. DiRosa. I do hereby also reject any other
translator especially one of the subjects of the foreign government
and sworn associates of the Louisiana Bar Association. Certified
this 20th day of January, 2010
Malinda
Nicole DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New
Orleans, La. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this document has
been prepared and filed either before court in the clerk's office or
in open court. The Original for the Court and a true and correct
copy for the district attorney. This 20th day of January,
2010
Malinda
Nicole DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New
Orleans, La. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
TOP
|
